Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41289279›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Predicting IVF outcomes using a logistic regression-ABC hybrid model: A proof-of-concept study on supplement associations.

Uğur Ejder, Pınar Uskaner Hepsağ

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Uğur EjderDepartment of Information Technology, Adana Alparslan Türkeş Science and Technology University, Adana, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7796-9528
Pınar Uskaner HepsağFaculty of Computer and Informatics, Adana Alparslan Türkeş Science and Technology University, Adana, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning models are increasingly applied to assisted reproductive technologies (ART), yet most studies rely on conventional algorithms with limited optimization. This proof-of-concept study investigates whether a hybrid Logistic Regression-Artificial Bee Colony (LR-ABC) framework can enhance predictive performance in in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes while producing interpretable, hypothesis-driven associations with nutritional and pharmaceutical supplement use. A retrospective dataset of 162 women undergoing IVF was analyzed. Clinical, demographic, and supplement variables were preprocessed into 21 predictors. Four algorithms (K-Nearest Neighbors, Classification and Regression Tree, Support Vector Machine, and Random Forest) were implemented alongside their LR-ABC hybrid counterparts. Model performance was evaluated using 5-fold cross-validation with Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) to address class imbalance. Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) were applied to improve interpretability. Across all algorithm models, LR-ABC hybrids outperformed their baseline models (e.g., Random Forest: 85.2% → 91.36% accuracy). LIME explanations identified omega-3, folic acid, and dietician support as influential features in individual predictions. However, given the small sample size, binary representation of supplements, and absence of external validation, the observed improvements and associations should be regarded as exploratory rather than definitive. The LR-ABC hybrid model demonstrates methodological potential for improving prediction and interpretability in IVF research. Findings regarding supplement associations are hypothesis-generating, not clinically directive. Future studies with larger, multi-center datasets including detailed dosage and dietary data are needed to validate and extend this framework.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsFertilization in VitroAdultAlgorithmsFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMachine LearningPregnancyProof of Concept StudyRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID41289279
PMCPMC12646469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.