Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41289261›Full record

ArticlemAbs2025

Energy-based generative models for monoclonal antibodies.

Paul Pereira, Hervé Minoux, Aleksandra M Walczak, Thierry Mora

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mAbs, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Paul PereiraLaboratoire de Physique de l'École Normale supérieure, CNRS, PSL University, Sorbonne Université, and Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Hervé MinouxSanofi, Vitry-Sur-Seine, France.
Aleksandra M WalczakLaboratoire de Physique de l'École Normale supérieure, CNRS, PSL University, Sorbonne Université, and Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Thierry MoraLaboratoire de Physique de l'École Normale supérieure, CNRS, PSL University, Sorbonne Université, and Université de Paris, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5456-9361

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche GRANT NO ANR-19-CE45-0018 “RESP-REP”Sanofi, the European Research Council consolidator GRANT NO 724208
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the approval of the first antibody drug in 1986, a total of 162 antibodies have been approved for a wide range of therapeutic areas, including cancer, autoimmune, infectious, or cardiovascular diseases. Despite advances in biotechnology that accelerated the development of antibody drugs, the drug discovery process for this modality remains lengthy and costly, requiring multiple rounds of optimizations before a drug candidate can progress to preclinical and clinical trials. This multi-optimization problem involves increasing the affinity of the antibody to the target antigen while refining additional biophysical properties that are essential to drug development such as solubility, thermostability or aggregation propensity. Additionally, antibodies that resemble natural human antibodies are particularly desirable, as they are likely to offer improved profiles in terms of safety, efficacy, and reduced immunogenicity, further supporting their therapeutic potential. In this article, we explore the use of energy-based generative models to optimize a candidate monoclonal antibody. We identify tradeoffs when optimizing for multiple properties, focusing on solubility, humanness and affinity and use the generative model we develop to generate candidate antibodies that lie on optimal Pareto fronts with respect to these properties.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAnimalsAntibody AffinityDrug DiscoveryHumansSolubilityAntibodies, MonoclonalAI modelsComputational designmulti-objective optimization

Identifiers

PMID41289261
PMCPMC12952271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.