ArticlePloS one2025
A survey of barriers and facilitators to primary care staff conducting research.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Barriers and Associated Factors to Writing Case Reports Among Japanese General Medicine Physicians: A Cross-Sectional Study of the Japan Primary Care Association Members.Journal of general and family medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundResearch is essential to find ways of improving healthcare although is not established in primary care. This study aims to investigate the barriers and facilitators to primary care staff conducting research in one geographical area of the UK.
methodA survey was developed for primary care staff using validated questions where possible. It was distributed using Online SurveysTM by email, social media and personal contact.
resultsOne hundred and ten participants were recruited from 29 GP practices in one geographical area, 74 (67.2%) were female and 35 (31.8%) were male. Nearly three quarters (73.6%) were clinical with the remainder non-clinical staff. Sixty percent of participants had been asked to conduct research and just over 40% had never conducted research. Twenty-three participants (20.9%) had conducted research six or more times. The largest facilitator for research was the knowledge that it would make a difference to patients. Allocated time, clear communication about what was involved and making a difference for colleagues were also ranked highly. The largest barrier for research was the inability to fit anything extra in and concerns over how much work would be involved. Thirty-nine percent of clinicians knew how to gain knowledge from evidence and apply it to practice. Those who were enrolled on an educational course were more likely to be research active.
conclusionPrimary care staff are more likely to take part in research if it has clear patient benefit. Communication about time commitments, research outcomes and data security are important when deciding to become involved. Staff may worry that they do not have the right skills to take part. Recommendations include co-design of studies, improved communication and administrative support. The recording of research activity and literacy at clinician annual review would allow these parameters to be measured.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.