Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41289230›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2025

Collaborative rule learning promotes interbrain information alignment.

Denise Moerel, Tijl Grootswagers, Genevieve L Quek, Sophie Smit, Manuel Varlet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Multi-brain neurofeedback: what are we training for?Trends in cognitive sciences · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Denise MoerelThe MARCS Institute for Brain, Behaviour and Development, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9677-0170
Tijl GrootswagersThe MARCS Institute for Brain, Behaviour and Development, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia.
Genevieve L QuekThe MARCS Institute for Brain, Behaviour and Development, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia.
Sophie SmitThe MARCS Institute for Brain, Behaviour and Development, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia.
Manuel VarletThe MARCS Institute for Brain, Behaviour and Development, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

ARC Discovery Early Career Researcher AwardAustralian Research Council (ARC)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social interactions shape our perception of the world, influencing how we interpret incoming information. Alignment between interacting individuals' sensory and cognitive processes is key to successful cooperation and communication, but the neural processes underlying this alignment remain unknown. Here, we leveraged Representational Similarity Analysis (RSA) on electroencephalography (EEG) hyperscanning data to investigate information alignment in 24 pairs of participants who performed a categorization task together based on agreed-upon rules. Significant interbrain information alignment emerged within 45 ms of stimulus presentation and persisted for hundreds of milliseconds. Early alignment (45-180 ms) occurred in both real and randomly matched pseudo-pairs, reflecting shared sensory responses. Importantly, alignment after 200 ms strengthened with practice and was unique to real pairs, driven by shared representations associated with, and extending beyond, the categorization rules they formed. Together, these findings highlight distinct processes underpinning interbrain information alignment during social interactions, that can be effectively captured and disentangled with Interbrain RSA.

Indexed as

BrainCooperative BehaviorLearningSocial InteractionAdultCognitionElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansInterpersonal RelationsMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41289230
PMCPMC12646437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.