ArticleBlood advances2026
Predictive capacity of peritransplant measurable residual disease thresholds in NPM1-mutant acute myeloid leukemia.
Article in Blood advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractMeasurable residual disease (MRD) monitoring for mutated NPM1 is increasingly used to guide treatment decisions in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) carrying this mutation. NPM1-MRD positivity after induction has been shown to identify patients who may benefit from allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT), and NPM1-MRD monitoring after allo-HCT can detect early relapse, enabling the prompt initiation of salvage therapy. However, recommendations for clinical decision-making based on peritransplant NPM1-MRD levels are missing. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed 172 patients with NPM1-mutant AML treated at 2 German centers to explore the predictive values of NPM1-MRD measured before and after allo-HCT. We found that pretransplant MRD negativity was a strong predictor of favorable long-term overall survival (OS). In contrast, patients with positive and negative NPM1-MRD status at day 30 after HCT showed comparable OS. Finally, statistically derived NPM1-MRD thresholds effectively stratified MRD-high and MRD-low patient groups with differential outcome, with 2 peritransplant MRD risk scores obtained by longitudinal integration. First, a combined score using MRD measurements before HCT and at day 30 HCT was used to guide early reduction of immunosuppression (concordance index [C-index], 0.737). Second, a combined score using MRD measurements before HCT and at day 30 and day 100 after HCT was used to guide later post-HCT interventions (C-index, 0.841; stratified 2-year OS groups, 100%, 90.1%, 57.1%, and 25.7%; P< .0001). This approach predicted OS better than age, FLT3-ITD status, or morphological remission status. We propose that in the peritransplant setting, NPM1-MRD thresholds are superior to conventional MRD analysis based on binary or log-step change data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.