ArticleActa paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992)2026
Population-Based Cohort Study for Development of National Retinopathy of Prematurity Screening Criteria.
Article in Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimScreening criteria for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) vary among countries. Early detection of ROP and minimising the burden of screening are important.
methodsWe analysed data from very preterm infants born in Switzerland between 2006 and 2022. Logistic regression models were fitted to evaluate 17 potential risk factors for ROP treatment.
results168/11354 patients (median (range) gestational age (GA) 29.6 (23.0-31.9) weeks) required ROP treatment. All would have been detected and screening burden would have been reduced by 56% if screening had required meeting ≥ 1 of the following criteria: GA < 27 weeks (89.3%), birth weight < 1000 g (97.0%), intraventricular haemorrhage≥II° (24.0%), congenital tumour (1.2%). We identified six statistically significant risk factors for ROP: GA (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.46, 95% CI 0.40-0.52, p < 0.001), birth weight z-score (aOR 0.58, 95% CI 0.46-0.73, p < 0.001), duration of supplemental oxygen (aOR 1.01 95% CI 1.01-1.02, p < 0.001), duration of mechanical ventilation (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00-1.02, p = 0.018), caesarean section (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.06-3.36, p = 0.038), and congenital tumour (OR 26.3, 95% CI 2.71-189, p = 0.002). The model allowed for excellent prediction of ROP treatment (AUC 0.963, 95% CI 0.944-0.981).
conclusionsSafely reducing the burden of ROP screening appears achievable in Switzerland.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.