ArticleCJEM2026
Medico-legal risk in the emergency department.
Article in CJEM, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Continuous Increase in Both Waiting and Process Time in the Emergency Rooms of Abruzzo, Italy.Epidemiologia (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe landscape of the medico-legal risk in emergency medicine in Canada is unknown. The objective of this study was to describe and analyze factors associated with medico-legal risk in cases in the emergency department (ED).
methodsWe conducted a descriptive analysis of closed medico-legal cases (hospital complaints, regulatory authority (i.e., College) complaints, and civil-legal actions) involving physicians practicing primarily emergency medicine in Canadian EDs. We used data from closed cases involving the Canadian Medical Protective Association from January 2018 until December 2022. We abstracted descriptive factors of the cases and used a framework for contributing factors classification.
resultsFrom 2018 until 2022, 37,046 cases were closed and 1,892 involved physicians practicing emergency medicine for which there was medico-legal information available for analysis. In all, 54% (1,019) were College complaints, 27% (516) were legal civil actions, and 19% (357) were hospital complaints. Out of these, 1,165 (62%) were subject to peer-expert criticism. More than half of the complaints (52%) resulted in an unfavorable medico-legal outcome for the physician. Analysis of the 1,165 cases with peer-expert criticism identified the most common factors contributing to medico-legal risk included clinical decision-making (64%), situational awareness (44%), and issues with provider's documentation (42%).
conclusionsThe most common diagnoses associated with medico-legal risk were injuries, infections, and disorders of the circulatory system. The three most common contributing factors were related to clinical decision-making, situational awareness, and issues with documentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.