Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41288907›Full record

ArticleHEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues2026

Carrying the Facilitator Responsibility: Experiences of Healthcare Professionals Under Training to Become Facilitators of Ethics Case Reflection Rounds in Paediatric Oncology.

Cecilia Bartholdson, Bert Molewijk, Margreet Stolper, Pernilla Pergert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cecilia BartholdsonChildhood Cancer Research Unit, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. cecilia.bartholdson@ki.se.ORCID 0000-0001-5807-3438
Bert MolewijkMedical Humanities, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1944-9759
Margreet StolperMedical Humanities, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5942-5204
Pernilla PergertChildhood Cancer Research Unit, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4210-855X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In paediatric oncology, ethical dilemmas often arise and includes different perspectives about what is perceived as ethically right care for the child. Ethics Case Reflection (ECR) rounds, a form of Clinical Ethics Support (CES), offer a structured, dialogical approach to facilitate ethical reflection. A Nordic working group on ethics in pediatric oncology offers a training program for healthcare professionals to become facilitators for ECR rounds. The aim of this study was to explore experiences of these facilitator trainees when facilitating ECR rounds in Nordic paediatric oncology. Using classic grounded theory methodology, data were collected through three focus groups with 22 Nordic facilitator trainees and 27 individual interviews with 17 facilitator trainees from Sweden. Carrying the facilitator responsibility is the core category in this study, used to resolve the main concern of delivering a meaningful experience of ethics support and enabling ethically good care for the child. To carry the facilitator responsibility and handle associated challenges, the condition of achieved facilitator confidence and the strategies of allying and undertaking the facilitator role is important. ECR facilitator trainees take their role seriously as they are carrying the facilitator responsibility to deliver a meaningful experience of CES and enable ethically good care for the child. We conclude that this perceived burden of responsibility should be better addressed during future facilitator trainings, emphasising the use of various strategies to decrease this burden and share the responsibility for the ECR together with the ECR participants. Training also needs to strengthen ethical competence to achieve facilitator confidence of the trainees. Further research is needed on what kind of core ethical competencies facilitators of ECR rounds needs.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelMedical OncologyPediatricsTeaching RoundsAdultChildFemaleFocus GroupsGrounded TheoryHumansMaleQualitative ResearchSwedenClassic grounded theoryEthics case reflectionEthics supportFacilitatorMoral case deliberationQualitativeResponsibility

Identifiers

PMID41288907
PMCPMC13194328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.