ArticleThe Milbank quarterly2025
Health Effects of the 2021 Earned Income Tax Credit Expansion on Young Adults Without Children.
Article in The Milbank quarterly, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Policy Points In 2021, young adults without children became (temporarily) newly eligible for the earned income tax credit, the largest US poverty alleviation program. This 2021 expansion was associated with fewer poor mental health days and modest improvements in physical health. This study suggests the importance of providing economic support for young adults at this critical juncture of the life course, when they are ineligible for many other social safety net benefits. CONTEXT: In 2021, Congress expanded the earned income tax credit (EITC)-the largest US poverty alleviation program-to young adults without children who had previously been ineligible. The EITC improves health by targeting poverty as a social determinant of health, but no studies have examined health effects of the 2021 expansion on this newly eligible population during this critical period of their life span. This study addresses this gap in the literature.
methodsWe used 2021-2023 serial cross-sectional data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (N = 11,137), restricting the analysis to low-income young adults without children. We used quasi-experimental difference-in-differences and event study models to evaluate the impact of the EITC expansion on self-reported health and health behaviors. We considered (newly eligible) young adults aged 18 to 24 years without children to be exposed and those aged 25 to 34 years (already eligible) to be unexposed. We compared those interviewed during the EITC expansion to those interviewed before the expansion and after its expiration. Outcomes included mental and physical health in the past 30 days and binge drinking. Models were adjusted for self-reported demographic covariates and month and state fixed effects. We carried out numerous sensitivity analyses.
findingsIn difference-in-differences models, the 2021 EITC expansion was associated with fewer poor mental health days (-1.08; 95% CI -1.94 to -0.23). Event study models confirmed this and also demonstrated modest improvements in physical health. There were no effects on binge drinking. Effects were similar among various subgroups (i.e., sex, race/ethnicity). Results were robust to sensitivity analyses.
conclusionsExpanding the EITC improved the health and well-being of young adults without children, a group often left out of US safety net programs during this key juncture of the life course. This study informs ongoing decisions regarding EITC policy design at the state and federal levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.