ArticleIntegrative psychological & behavioral science2025
Existential Parallelism: A Theoretical Integration for Understanding a Modern Crisis of Meaning.
Article in Integrative psychological & behavioral science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper introduces Existential Parallelism, a work of theoretical integration designed to provide a new synthesis for understanding the proliferation of inauthentic living in late modernity. We argue that contemporary structural conditions, characterized by neoliberal rationality and the cultural burden of perpetual self-construction, foster a widespread “existential vacuum.” Theorized as a systemic societal condition, this vacuum channels individuals toward “substitute attachments”, market-driven replacements for authentic sources of meaning, such as genuine community and value-based action. These substitutes (e.g., consumerism, ideological rigidity) simulate purpose while deepening alienation. We posit that cognitive biases function as crucial stabilizing mechanisms, sustaining the parallel life paths that mimic authenticity but ultimately diverge from it. By integrating knowledge from classical social theory (including the Frankfurt School), existential philosophy, and cognitive science, this framework reinterprets crises like political polarization and burnout as predictable outcomes of a social order that commodifies meaning. This paper contributes to a more universal social science not only by offering a synthesized model for critique but also by outlining potential pathways toward authenticity, thus addressing both the diagnosis of and potential remedies for this contemporary crisis of meaning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41288823What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.