SynthesisEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2025
Rehabilitation following locked intramedullary fibular nail fixation: a systematic review.
Synthesis in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis systematic review aims to assess locked intramedullary fibula fixation by (1) identifying and reporting current rehabilitation protocols, and (2) determining if there is an evidence-based rehabilitation protocol supported by consensus. We hypothesize that no current consensus exists and there is significant heterogeneity in reported rehabilitation protocols. DESIGN AND
methodsA systematic review of the current literature was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The certainty of evidence was reported using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation). Primary outcomes included rehabilitation protocols, specifically addressing weightbearing, range of motion, and physical therapy, following locked intramedullary fibular nail. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported outcome scores.
resultsTen studies were reviewed, including seven retrospective case series and three randomized control trials. Three studies had varied weight-bearing protocols based on fracture pattern, intraoperative assessment, or surgeon preference, while others used standardized protocols. Only four studies reported postoperative Physical Therapy (PT) and Range of Motion (ROM) protocols; two initiated PT after cast removal at six weeks. Immobilization protocols varied across studies in terms of duration and method. Two studies used a postoperative splint followed by a cast after swelling reduced or 24 h post-surgery.
conclusionsThere is significant heterogeneity in reported rehabilitation protocols, and proposed benefits of locked IMN procedures like early weightbearing are seldom included. No evidence-based rehab protocol has been established. We propose developing an evidence-informed rehabilitation protocol that utilizes unique characteristics of locked IMN procedures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4:
Indexed as
Identifiers
41288817What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.