Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41288797›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of pediatrics2025

Higher (40%) versus lower (30%) FiO

Mir Inamul Haq, Vikram Datta, Tapas Bandyopadhyay, Sushma Nangia, Pratima Anand, Vishnu Mohan Murukesan

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mir Inamul HaqDepartment of Neonatology, Lady Hardinge Medical College and Associated Hospitals, New Delhi, India.
Vikram DattaDepartment of Neonatology, Lady Hardinge Medical College and Associated Hospitals, New Delhi, India. drvikramdatta@gmail.com.
Tapas BandyopadhyayDepartment of Pediatrics, Vardhaman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Sushma NangiaDepartment of Neonatology, Lady Hardinge Medical College and Associated Hospitals, New Delhi, India.
Pratima AnandDepartment of Neonatology, Lady Hardinge Medical College and Associated Hospitals, New Delhi, India.
Vishnu Mohan MurukesanDepartment of Neonatology, Lady Hardinge Medical College and Associated Hospitals, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The optimal FiO₂ threshold for surfactant administration in preterm neonates with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) remains uncertain, with limited evidence supporting current guideline recommendations. The objective was to compare the total duration of respiratory support between two FiO₂ thresholds for surfactant administration in preterm neonates stabilized on CPAP. In this non-inferiority randomized control trial (RCT), preterm neonates (26-32 weeks' gestation) with RDS were randomized at 1 h of life to receive surfactant at FiO₂ thresholds of either 40% or 30%. The primary outcome was total duration of respiratory support. The secondary outcomes were requirement of surfactant within 6 h after birth, requirement of repeat dose of surfactant, common morbidities of prematurity bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) stage ≥ 2, air leaks, hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus (hsPDA) (requiring treatment), all-cause mortality, and total duration of hospital stay. Subgroup analysis for gestation between 26 and 29 weeks was done. A total of 205 neonates with a mean birth weight of 1237.92 ± 328.89 g and a mean gestation age of 30.06 ± 1.85 weeks were enrolled. The mean duration of respiratory support was 140.8 h in 40% FiO

conclusionThis first randomized controlled trial directly comparing FiO₂ thresholds of 40% versus 30% for surfactant administration in preterm infants (26-32 weeks) found the higher threshold to be non-inferior, with comparable respiratory and clinical outcomes. The use of a 40% threshold significantly reduced surfactant exposure without increasing complications, supporting its role as a safe and cost-effective strategy for resource-limited settings.

trial registrationCTRI/2023/12/060562. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Early surfactant administration improves outcomes in preterm neonates with RDS. • International guidelines generally recommend a FiO₂ threshold of 30% for surfactant therapy. WHAT IS NEW: • This is the first randomized controlled trial directly comparing FiO₂ thresholds of 40% versus 30% for surfactant administration. • A 40% threshold was non-inferior to 30% in preterm infants (26-32 weeks) without an increase in adverse outcomes, and  thus has the potential to support cost effective neonatal care in resource-limited settings and  reduce NICU workload. .

Indexed as

OxygenPulmonary SurfactantsRespiratory Distress Syndrome, NewbornBronchopulmonary DysplasiaContinuous Positive Airway PressureFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureMaleTreatment OutcomeOxygenPulmonary SurfactantsCPAPFiO₂ thresholdLISANon-inferiorityPretermRDSSurfactant

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.