ArticleDiscover oncology2025
Using single cell sequencing to investigate tumor microenvironment differences in left and right colon cancer and prognosis-related core genes.
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundColon cancer is a common intestinal malignancy and previous studies reported many differences between left (LCC) and right colon cancer (RCC). Traditional research methods are unable to compare differences within tumors at the single-cell level.
methodsWe downloaded single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA seq) data from GEO database. After quality control we conducted cell clustering, annotation and pseudotime analysis to identify the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in RCC compared to LCC. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was undertaken to explore the pathways these DEGs involved. Based on the expression of these DEGs, we divided patients from TCGA (The Cancer Genome Atlas) database. The differences of tumor microenvironment and immune infiltration in different clusters were also analyzed. WGCNA was performed to select the survival-related genes. Survival-related DEGs were selected and univariate Cox regression analysis was conducted to further identify independent prognostic genes. A nomogram model was established for risk prediction and its accuracy was verified by calibration curve and immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis.
resultsWe found significant differences of tumor microenvironment and immune infiltration among three patient clusters. The patients with high infiltration of memory B cells were associated with poorer survival. We eventually obtained seven prognosis-related genes: S100P, LGALS4, TIMP1, DNASE1L3, BGN, TPM2 and LY6E, based on which a risk model was constructed, which was an accurate independent predictor for CRC patients. IHC stanning confirmed that the expression levels of these prognostic genes in tumor versus adjacent non-tumor tissues were consistent with our risk model.
conclusionsOur prognosis-related risk model based on DEGs between RCC and LCC may provide better prediction of clinical outcomes for patients with colon cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.