Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41288781›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2025

Analysis of factors associated with loco-regional failure in breast cancer patients following neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Hazim S Ababneh, George E Naoum, Andrzej Niemierko, Amy Ly, Alphonse G Taghian

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hazim S AbabnehDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 100 Blossom Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
George E NaoumDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Andrzej NiemierkoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 100 Blossom Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Amy LyDepartment of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Alphonse G TaghianDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 100 Blossom Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. ataghian@mgh.harvard.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PURPOSE/

objectivesFor patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), many clinical factors were identified to be associated with failure. Yet, for patients achieving pathologic complete response (pCR), it remains unknown what factors are associated with any subsequent failures. Our goal is to assess the patterns and predictors of locoregional failure (LRF), distant failure (DF), and invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) post-NAC, with a particular focus on those who achieved pCR. METHODS/MATERIALS: Between 2000 and 2021, we retrospectively reviewed 1115 consecutive patients in a single-institution database following NAC. Multivariable analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazards model to identify the independent predictors of LRF, DF, and IDFS for the entire cohort and stratified by type of breast surgery. A univariable analysis was conducted to ascertain the independent predictors of any failure (IDFS) among patients who achieved pCR in both the breast and axilla.

resultsThe median follow-up was 8.0 years [interquartile range: 4.1-12.4 years]. For the entire cohort, the 15-year cumulative incidence rates were 9.7% for LRF and 27.4% for DF, and the 15 year IDFS was 69.6%. The 15-year IDFS rates were 73.6% and 67.2% in breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and mastectomy cohorts, respectively (HR = 0.76, p = 0.03). On multivariable analysis, we found that LVI, ECE, number of malignant LNs post-NAC, triple-negative disease (TNBC), and tumor size were associated with IDFS for mastectomy patients, while achieving pCR in the breast was associated with a decreased risk for any failure. For BCS patients, the number of malignant LNs post-NAC, and TNBC were associated with IDFS, while achieving pCR in the axilla was associated with a decreased risk for any failure. On univariable analysis, we found that cT3-4 vs. cT1-2 pre-NAC was significantly associated with inferior IDFS among patients who achieved pCR in both the breast and axilla (n = 209). Patients with cN0 pre-NAC had a lower, albeit non-significant, risk of IDFS events. In patients with cN-positive disease pre-NAC who achieved pCR in both the breast and axilla (n = 117), RNI or PMRT (n = 95) did not significantly impact IDFS compared to those without RNI or PMRT (n = 22), with a median time to IDFS post-pCR of 7.1 years vs. 7.8 years, respectively.

conclusionWe identified predictors of failure in this cohort, including among patients who achieved pCR. The median time to failure after pCR is around 7 years with or without adjuvant RNI/PMRT, highlighting the need to wait for mature results from the B51 trial and warranting further follow-up.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalAdultAgedChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMastectomyMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment FailureBreast cancerInvasive disease-free survivalLocoregional failureNeoadjuvant chemotherapypCR ratesRNI/PMRT –B51 trial

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.