Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41288773›Full record

ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2025

Revision arthroplasty versus open reduction and internal fixation in Vancouver type B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures: results from a matched pairs analysis of the registry for geriatric trauma of the DGU

Anna Schweer, Hannah Schmidt, Bastian Pass, Carsten Schoeneberg, Rene Aigner, Rene Burchard, Artur Barsumyan, Christopher Bliemel, on behalf ot the AltersTraumaRegister DGU

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anna SchweerCenter for Trauma Surgery and Orthopedics, Lahn-Dill-Kliniken Wetzlar, Wetzlar, Germany.
Hannah SchmidtAcademy of Trauma Surgery (AUC) GmbH, Munich, Germany.
Bastian PassPhilipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Carsten SchoenebergPhilipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Rene AignerPhilipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Rene BurchardPhilipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Artur BarsumyanPhilipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Christopher BliemelPhilipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany. christopher.bliemel@lahn-dill-kliniken.de.
on behalf ot the AltersTraumaRegister DGU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesOwing to a lack of evidence, the appropriate surgical treatment strategy for geriatric patients with Vancouver type B2 or B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) remains unclear. Data from a large international geriatric trauma registry were analyzed to investigate the medical care situation of such patients, as well as to examine the outcomes related to revision arthroplasty (RA) or open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). MATERIALS AND

methodsDatasets from the Registry for Geriatric Trauma of the German Trauma Society (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie [DGU]) (ATR-DGU) were analyzed. The ATR-DGU is a prospective, multicenter registry that provides information on geriatric trauma patients. All patients who underwent surgery for PFF were included in this analysis. The outcome parameters included the mortality rate during hospitalization and at the 120-day follow-up, as well as mobility, the EQ-5D-5 L score and the reoperation rate, and were analyzed in relation to RA versus ORIF in Vancouver type B2 or B3 PFF patients.

resultsA total of 607 patients with Vancouver type B2 or B3 PFF met the inclusion criteria. Among these patients, 420 underwent RA, and ORIF was performed in 187 patients. Regression analysis of the parameters collected during the acute phase revealed that after 2:1 matching, compared with the RA group, the ORIF group had significantly lower odds for full weight bearing allowed one day after surgery (OR: 0.49; p < 0.001); walking ability after seven days (OR: 0.56; p = 0.005); and the occurrence of nonsurgical complications (OR: 0.59; p = 0.012). The probability of death during follow-up and the EQ-5D-5 L score after seven and 120 days remained unaffected.

conclusionsThe results of the present study support the estimate that ORIF represents a valid treatment alternative for Vancouver type B2 and B3 PFFs, as comparable midterm outcomes were demonstrated for each patient group. However, individualized decisions should always be made, especially for multimorbid geriatric patients, to reduce complications.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipFemoral FracturesFracture Fixation, InternalOpen Fracture ReductionPeriprosthetic FracturesAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMatched-Pair AnalysisProspective StudiesRegistriesReoperationTreatment OutcomeAltersTraumaRegister DGUMortalityOpen reduction internal fixationPeriprosthetic femoral fractureQuality of lifeRevision arthroplastyVancouver type B2 and B3 fractures

Identifiers

PMID41288773
PMCPMC12647193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.