ArticleHistochemistry and cell biology2025
Immunohistochemical analysis to detect a molecular signature in intervertebral disc degeneration.
Article in Histochemistry and cell biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Superoxide dismutase in intervertebral disc degeneration: from pathophysiological mechanism to therapeutic strategies.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD) is known as a primary contributor to low back pain, a debilitating condition which is the leading cause of disability worldwide. Traditionally, its assessment is based on clinical parameters, including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, patients with similar radiological findings may have significantly different prognoses suggesting the involvement of patient-specific biomarkers and little-investigated molecules supporting the complexity of the pathophysiological microenvironment of the intervertebral disc (IVD). We conducted a study on IVD biopsies from 40 patients with mild IDD (Pfirrmann III), to identify a potential molecular signature that correlates with clinical and behavioral parameters including sex, age, smoking, body mass index (BMI), duration of symptoms prior to surgery, inflammatory cell density, or surgical site. Immunohistological analysis focused on the expression of proteins involved in the defense against oxidative stress, in the maintenance of IVD homeostasis, and energy metabolism: the transcription factors FOXO3a, HIF1α, Bry, the enzyme SOD2, and the glucose transporter GLUT1. Significant differences in protein expression were observed only in relation to Pfirrmann grade. Within the grade III subgroup, expression levels did not vary with patient-specific parameters or clinical outcomes such as complete healing, recurrence, or persistent pain after surgery. This highlights the importance of broadening the scope of assessment in pathological conditions such as IDD. Rather than limiting the evaluation to the expression level of a single protein marker, it is crucial to collect comprehensive data on the various factors that may influence individual patient responses to disc degeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.