ArticleCurrent microbiology2025
Comparative Analysis of Bacterial Communities in Soil and Intestines of Fish from Traditional and Modern Rice-Fish Coculture Systems.
Article in Current microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To compare the soil and fish intestinal bacterial communities between traditional (TRF) and modern (MRF) rice-fish co-culture system, examining the impact of feed supplementation. High-throughput 16S rRNA gene sequencing was used to assess structure, diversity, composition, and functional predictions in soil and intestinal communities between TRF and MRF systems in Qingtian, Zhejiang Province, China. Key findings revealed that both soil and fish intestinal bacterial communities in the MRF system exhibited higher diversity and richness than those in the TRF. In soil, Pseudomonadota dominated both systems. MRF enriched Bacillota, whereas TRF enriched oligotrophy-linked Acidobacteriota and Chloroflexota. In intestine, TRF was Fusobacteriota-centered with Cetobacterium and Aeromonas dominance. While MRF was more even, with higher Bacillota, Actinomycetota, Clostridium and Mycobacterium. Which consistent with adaptation to formulated feeds. Rice yields remained unchanged, suggesting microbial buffering of nutrient input. Functional prediction (COG) indicated that MRF microbiota were enriched in carbohydrate metabolism and signal transduction, whereas TRF favored biosynthetic pathways. These findings offer insights for sustainable rice-fish co-culture system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41288739What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.