ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026
The evolution of age estimation methods in forensic odontology: a bibliometric analysis from 2002 to 2024.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dental age estimation (DAE) is critical in forensic practice. However, quantitative analyses of key parameters like sample types and sizes had yet to be performed. This bibliometric study analyzed 187 research articles from the Web of Science Core Collection, independently screened by two researchers. After that, co-occurrence analysis, and data visualization were employed. Over this two decades, India, Germany, and China were the most productive nations, with Germany achieving the highest cumulative impact factor. Leading institutions included Münster University, Leuven University, and Ghent University. Key contributors were Schmeling and Timme. The most studied teeth were third molars, canines, and central incisors. Imaging modalities showed distinct trends: OPG dominated pre-2015 (typically < 2000 samples), while CBCT has increased post-2015 (typically < 400 samples). Periapical radiographs are seldom used in contemporary studies, while MRI is still minimally utilized in dental age estimation research compared to other modalities. Primary publication journals are International Journal of Legal Medicine and Forensic Science International. Keywords occurrence revealed three methodological phases: Initial Phase (pre-2016): Focused on anatomical structures and forensic applications. Transitional Phase (2016-2020): Increased adoption of 3D imaging techniques, particularly CBCT. Current Phase (post-2020): Shifted towards AI-driven data methods. Based on our research, we consider that the primary research will shift toward: developing whole-age estimation models, enhancing interdisciplinary collaboration, and strengthening international research networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41288730What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.