SynthesisClinical neuroradiology2026
General Versus Non-General Anesthesia in Endovascular Thrombectomy for Distal/Medium Vessel Occlusions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Clinical neuroradiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Arterial Occlusion Caused by Intimal Flap Elevation After Arteriosclerosis Obliterans Stent Implantation: A Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWith the expanding use of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for distal and medium vessel occlusions (DMVOs), evaluating how anesthesia type affects clinical outcomes is essential. This meta-analysis compared outcomes between general anesthesia (GA) and non-GA in patients undergoing EVT for DMVOs.
methodsWe systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for eligible studies. Primary outcomes included successful reperfusion, 90-day mortality, excellent functional outcome (Modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0-1), and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel method and a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed with I
resultsFive studies comprising 1643 patients were included. There was no significant difference in successful reperfusion between GA and non-GA groups (RR 1.01; 95% CI 0.94-1.08; I
conclusionGA was linked to increased 90-day mortality in EVT for DMVOs, with no differences in reperfusion or functional recovery. A possible higher risk of sICH was noted. Further prospective studies are needed to guide anesthetic strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41288722What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.