Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41288717›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2025

Surgical treatment of non-unions in the ulna and radius: a one-year outcome study.

Sebastian Findeisen, Katinka Maier, Thomas Ferbert, Michael Tanner, Michael Tanner, Tobias Grossner, Tim Niklas Bewersdorf, Christian Schamberger, Gerhard Schmidmaier, Jessica Carina Böpple

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sebastian FindeisenClinic for Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Schlierbacher Landstraße 200a, Heidelberg, 69118, Germany. Sebastian.findeisen@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Katinka MaierClinic for Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Schlierbacher Landstraße 200a, Heidelberg, 69118, Germany.
Thomas FerbertClinic for Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Schlierbacher Landstraße 200a, Heidelberg, 69118, Germany.
Michael TannerClinic for Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Schlierbacher Landstraße 200a, Heidelberg, 69118, Germany.
Michael TannerClinic for Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Schlierbacher Landstraße 200a, Heidelberg, 69118, Germany.
Tobias GrossnerClinic for Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Schlierbacher Landstraße 200a, Heidelberg, 69118, Germany.
Tim Niklas BewersdorfClinic for Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Schlierbacher Landstraße 200a, Heidelberg, 69118, Germany.
Christian SchambergerClinic for Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Schlierbacher Landstraße 200a, Heidelberg, 69118, Germany.
Gerhard SchmidmaierClinic for Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Schlierbacher Landstraße 200a, Heidelberg, 69118, Germany.
Jessica Carina BöppleClinic for Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Schlierbacher Landstraße 200a, Heidelberg, 69118, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incidence of non-unions of the forearm following conservative or surgical treatment of forearm fractures ranges from 2% to 5.3%. These non-unions can lead to significant limitations in the patient's physical capabilities, necessitating an appropriate treatment plan. The aim of this study was to evaluate osseous consolidation of forearm non-unions after six months and one year as well as to assess patient-reported outcomes. A total of 36 patients with non-unions of the forearm, operatively treated in our department between 01/10 and 12/21, completed the follow-up period for this study. Radiographic evaluation was performed using the modified Lane-Sandhu Score. Osseous consolidation was assessed at six and 12 months postoperatively. Additionally, patient-reported outcomes and variations of surgical treatment were analysed. The prevalence of non-unions in our study was 30.56% for the ulna, 50% for the radius, and 19.44% for both bones. 85% of patients received bone grafts, with 48% receiving cortico-cancellous bone grafts (CCBG) and 52% receiving cancellous bone from the iliac crest or femur. In total, 67% of patients demonstrated consolidation of the non-union within six months of surgical treatment, increasing to 89% after one year. Among patients who received CCBG, 86% showed consolidation at six months, rising to 100% at one year. Additionally, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), including VAS and SF-12 scores, showed overall improvement. A sufficiently long follow-up period is crucial for patients with forearm non-unions. To ensure consolidation, a follow-up period of at least six months to one year is recommended. Furthermore, the use of cortico-cancellous bone grafting combined with locking compression plates (LCP) appears to be an effective technique, providing stability during the healing process and achieving satisfactory bone healing one year postoperatively.

Indexed as

Bone TransplantationFracture Fixation, InternalFractures, UnunitedRadius FracturesUlna FracturesAdultAgedFemaleFracture HealingHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresRadiographyTreatment OutcomeAutologous boneBone regenerationForearm non-unionNon-unionNon-union treatment

Identifiers

PMID41288717
PMCPMC12647169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.