ArticlePlant biology (Stuttgart, Germany)2026
Pollinator-dependence and specialization in three sunbird-pollinated, fire-stimulated flowering species.
Article in Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fires dramatically reduce both floral resources and pollinator abundance, potentially compromising flowering plant reproduction in post-fire landscapes through low pollination rates. Yet, some plant species flower shortly after fires (fire-stimulated flowering (FSF)), which seems a risky strategy given low pollinator abundance after fire. We investigated whether bird-pollinated plants with FSF have low pollinator dependence and generalized pollination systems to ensure reproduction in post-fire landscapes. This study was conducted in three nature reserves in fynbos within the Cape Floristic Region that experienced fires between 6 and 15 months previously. One bird-pollinated species (Watsonia pillansii, Satyrium carneum, or W. fourcadei) dominated at each site, where flower visitor counts were conducted in 15 plots (20 × 20 m), floral traits measured, and pollinator specialization for each species verified using hand pollination and exclusion experiments. The exclusion of bird pollinators from flowers highly reduced fruit set (>70%) for all three species, as well as seed set for the two Watsonia species. Although W. pillansii and S. carneum demonstrated partial self-compatibility, the fruit and seed set of self-pollinated inflorescences was reduced compared to cross- and naturally pollinated inflorescences, highlighting the importance of pollinators in the reproductive success of these species. Furthermore, all three species lack autogamy. Nevertheless, our results suggest that bird pollination, because of reduced competition for pollinator attention, remains the primary reproductive strategy. While these plants demonstrate partial self-compatibility and non-bird pollination, these mechanisms appear to complement rather than replace bird pollination, and may explain the persistence of these mutualisms despite recurring fire disturbances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.