ReviewNEJM evidence2025
Evaluating Treatment Effects with Patient-Response-Related Outcomes in Comparative Clinical Trials.
Review in NEJM evidence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
AbstractIn comparative clinical investigations for nearly all disease types, patient responses - signifying clinically meaningful improvements in health or reductions in disease burden - are routinely employed as key end points for assessing treatment activity or efficacy. Trials typically use the response rate to summarize treatment effects, a metric with limitations for investigating the temporal profile of the effect. In this Clinical Trials Workshop, the authors present a novel approach for analyzing time to response and duration of response in clinical trials using, as an example, data from the JAVELIN Renal-101 trial of avelumab and axitinib versus sunitinib for treating renal cell carcinoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.