ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2025
Exploring the Terra incognita of AI-based domain classifications.
Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The classification of novel protein folds remains a central challenge in structural bioinformatics, particularly as deep learning models like AlphaFold2 dramatically expand the universe of predicted protein structures. In this study, we investigated 664 candidate novel fold (CNF) domains from the TED database that both TED and DPAM methods had classified with low confidence. These CNFs span a structurally diverse and largely non-redundant set of domains, most of which lack clear sequence or structural similarity to known folds. Many CNFs appear as insertions into known transmembrane or enzymatic domains, while others occur in modular architectures, co-occurring with interaction or catalytic folds such as β-barrels, zinc fingers, or Rossmann-like domains. Although some CNFs resemble known folds that have undergone topological rearrangements or circular permutations, others result from errors in domain boundary prediction, often due to truncated sequences or tightly packed domain duplications. Our analyses led to the creation of 190 new Pfam families, many classified as domains of unknown function (DUFs), and revealed intriguing cases of zinc-binding and disulfide-rich architectures that contribute to fold space expansion. A small subset of CNFs helped define new superfamilies by linking previously unclassified but structurally related domains. Taken together, this work underscores the importance of integrating structural, evolutionary, and contextual information to resolve challenging fold assignments and provides a roadmap for extending protein classification frameworks into previously uncharted structural territory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.