ArticleClinical psychology & psychotherapy
DSM-5-TR Criteria and Domains for Narcissistic Personality Disorder: Evidence From Network Analysis Based on the Mental Health Professionals' Perspective.
Article in Clinical psychology & psychotherapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- DSM-5-TR Criteria and Domains for Narcissistic Personality Disorder: Evidence From Network Analysis Based on the Mental Health Professionals' Perspective.Clinical psychology & psychotherapyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Narcissistic personality disorder (NPD) is a complex disorder that, given the variety of its manifestations and the significant challenges related to its treatment, has attracted considerable attention from international scientific research. The present research aimed to investigate the centrality and the dynamics among the symptoms of NPD, based on the mental health professionals' perceptions. The research involved 376 mental health professionals, which evaluated the relative importance of diagnostic criteria for NPD outlined in Section II of the DSM-5-TR and the significance of maladaptive personality trait domains encompassed by Criterion B of Section III. Network analysis was then employed to analyse the collected data. Analysis of the NPD criteria network revealed two distinct symptom clusters related to the self and interpersonal dimensions of functioning. The need for admiration criterion emerged as a central node within this network. Furthermore, the network analysis concerning the domains confirmed the centrality of the antagonism domain in NPD. The findings of this study systematise the perspectives of mental health professionals using a network analysis approach to deepen our understanding of the core characteristics of NPD. These insights may offer valuable practical applications for both research and clinical practice, enhancing diagnostic accuracy and informing effective treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.