ArticleSystematic biology2026
Bioinformatics of Combined Nuclear and Mitochondrial Phylogenomics to Define Key Nodes for the Classification of Coleoptera.
Article in Systematic biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phylogenetic Authentication of Amplicon Sequence Variants in Single-Specimen Metabarcoding of Tropical Insects.Molecular ecology resources · 2026Article
- 2,366 new mitochondrial genomes with preliminary identification and phylogeny of >5,500 putative species of beetles.Scientific data · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nuclear genome sequencing for phylogenetics is resource-intensive while mitochondrial genomes can be sequenced and analyzed with relative ease for building densely sampled phylogenetic trees of the most species-rich lineages of animals. Here, we develop a conceptual approach and bioinformatics workflow for combining nuclear single-copy orthologs with less informative but densely sampled mitochondrial genomes, for a detailed tree of Coleoptera (beetles). Basal relationships of Coleoptera were first inferred from > 2,000 BUSCO loci mined from GenBank's Short Read Archive for 119 exemplars of all major lineages under various substitution models and levels of matrix completion, to reveal universally supported nodes. Second, the corresponding mitogenomes were extracted and combined with an additional 373 species selected for broad taxonomic and biogeographic coverage, roughly in proportion to the known global species diversity of Coleoptera. Bioinformatic processing of mitogenomes was conducted with a novel pipeline for rapid, accurate annotation of protein-coding genes. Finally, phylogenetic trees from all 491 mitogenomes were generated under a backbone constraint from the universal basal nodes, which produced a well-supported tree of the major lineages at the family and superfamily level. Being genetically unlinked and showing unique character variation, mitogenomes provide a unique perspective of the phylogeny. Comparison with 3 recent nuclear phylogenomic studies resulted in the recognition of > 80 nodes universally present across all analyses. These may now support the higher classification of Coleoptera and serve as backbone of further studies, as numerous full mitogenomes and mitochondrial DNA barcodes are added to an increasingly complete phylogenetic tree of this super-diverse insect order.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.