ArticleHealth promotion international2025
A policy analysis of active travel in public healthcare organizations, Victoria Australia.
Article in Health promotion international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A policy analysis of active travel in public healthcare organizations, Victoria Australia.Health promotion international · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Healthcare organizations contribute directly and indirectly to global greenhouse gas emissions and consequently to degradation of the environment and poor human health. Active travel has known positive effects on both the health of the environment and humans. Within Australia, healthcare organizations are significant employers and while efforts to reduce the impact of healthcare organizations on the environment are growing, there remains little advancement in increasing rates of active travel among healthcare staff. This study describes active travel policies in the public healthcare sector within the State of Victoria in Australia through a systematic analysis of publicly facing documents. A qualitative document analysis approach was adopted to investigate Victorian public healthcare organization's policies for active travel. Organizational websites, environmental policies, health promotion pages, and vision and mission statements were analysed for active travel policies and content. Of the 21 healthcare organizations investigated, none had a specific policy on active travel for its employees. Many organizations had environmental sustainability policies, with some policies referencing the need to transition staff into more sustainable commute modes. The inclusion of measurable policy objectives was mostly absent. There is a paucity of policies that would enable an increase in active travel in the major publicly funded Victorian healthcare organizations in Australia, despite the majority of organizations signing on to the Global Green and Healthy Hospitals Initiative, which highlights patient and staff transport as one of the ten sustainability goals. Without clear and actionable policy, healthcare organizations will remain at a difficult crossroads where their culture fails to reflect the health promoting advice they provide to their community. However, with this knowledge, opportunities such as improving end of trip facilities and the development of robust facilitative policy can be undertaken.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.