Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41287919›Full record

ArticlePsychological medicine2025

Optimizing the frequency of ecological momentary assessments using signal processing.

Hamidreza Jamalabadi, Tahmineh A Koosha, Elina Stocker, Andreas Jansen, Ulrich W Ebner-Priemer, Ricarda K K Proppert, Carlotta L Rieble, Rayyan Tutunji, Eiko I Fried

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Re-engineering the disordered mind: clinical experimentation, dynamical systems, and AI for personalized psychiatry.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hamidreza JamalabadiDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, https://ror.org/01rdrb571Marburg University, Marburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2485-2374
Tahmineh A KooshaDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, https://ror.org/01rdrb571Marburg University, Marburg, Germany.
Elina StockerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, https://ror.org/01rdrb571Marburg University, Marburg, Germany.
Andreas JansenDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, https://ror.org/01rdrb571Marburg University, Marburg, Germany.
Ulrich W Ebner-PriemerMental health Lab, Institute of Sports and Sports Science, https://ror.org/04t3en479Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2769-5944
Ricarda K K ProppertFaculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Psychology, https://ror.org/027bh9e22Leiden University, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4225-2439
Carlotta L RiebleFaculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Psychology, https://ror.org/027bh9e22Leiden University, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4764-3906
Rayyan TutunjiFaculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Psychology, https://ror.org/027bh9e22Leiden University, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3537-9888
Eiko I FriedFaculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Psychology, https://ror.org/027bh9e22Leiden University, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7469-594X

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 521379614HORIZON EUROPE Health 949059Von-Behring-Röntgen-Stiftung 70_0038
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEcological momentary assessment (EMA) is increasingly recognized as a vital tool for tracking the fluctuating nature of mental states and symptoms in psychiatric research. However, determining the optimal sampling rate - that is, deciding how often participants should be queried to report their symptoms - remains a significant challenge. To address this issue, our study utilizes the Nyquist-Shannon theorem from signal processing, which establishes that any sampling rate more than twice the highest frequency component of a signal is adequate.

methodsWe applied the Nyquist-Shannon theorem to analyze two EMA datasets on depressive symptoms, encompassing a combined total of 35,452 data points collected over periods ranging from 30 to 90 days per individual.

resultsOur analysis of both datasets suggests that the most effective sampling strategy involves measurements at least every other week. We find that measurements at higher frequencies provide valuable and consistent information across both datasets, with significant peaks at weekly and daily intervals.

conclusionsIdeal frequency for measurements remains largely consistent, regardless of the specific symptoms used to estimate depression severity. For conditions in which abrupt or transient symptom dynamics are expected, such as during treatment, more frequent data collection is recommended. However, for regular monitoring, weekly assessments of depressive symptoms may be sufficient. We discuss the implications of our findings for EMA study optimization, address our study's limitations, and outline directions for future research.

Indexed as

DepressionEcological Momentary AssessmentSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedAdultFemaleHumansMaleecological momentary assessment (EMA)major depression disorder (MDD)sampling ratesignal processing

Identifiers

PMID41287919
PMCPMC12671912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.