Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41287859›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2025

Efficacy and safety analysis of immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective study.

Luni Guo, Min Wang, Guochun Cao, Xiaohua Wang, Fei Yan, Ting Qian, Delin Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Luni GuoDepartment of Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University & Jiangsu Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Nanjing, China.
Min WangDepartment of the Pain Rehabilitation Clinic, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research & The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Guochun CaoDepartment of Oncology, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research & The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Xiaohua WangDepartment of Oncology, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research & The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Fei YanDepartment of Oncology, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research & The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Ting QianDepartment of Oncology, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research & The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Delin LiuDepartment of Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University & Jiangsu Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0009-0002-6545-7629

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New treatment strategies are needed for patients who relapse during or following first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor-based treatment for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Second-line immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) rechallenge aims to reactivate the immune system's response to tumor cells and may improve the prognosis of patients who progressed during or after completing previous treatment. The purpose of this study is to explore the effectiveness and safety of second-line ICI rechallenge therapy in the treatment of advanced ESCC. We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients with advanced ESCC at the Department of Oncology of Jiangsu Cancer Hospital (January 2021 to June 2023) who had at least one measurable lesion at progression after first-line immunotherapy, received at least two cycles of second-line treatment, and who had subsequently undergone radiographic response assessment. The primary outcomes of interest were the progression-free survival (PFS)and overall survival (OS). Treatment-related adverse events were also recorded. In the ICI rechallenge and non-ICI rechallenge groups, the objective response rate (ORR) was 15.4% and 11.8%, the disease control rate (DCR) was 67.6% and 44.1% (

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansImmunotherapyMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsEsophageal squamous cell carcinomaICI rechallenge therapyimmune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)radiotherapysecond-line treatment

Identifiers

PMID41287859
PMCPMC12934190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.