ArticlePeerJ2025
Evaluation study of effect of virtual care education on healthcare providers' knowledge, confidence, and satisfaction.
Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinician Experiences With Tele-Emergency Care: Qualitative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Virtual care can increase access to healthcare and improve provider efficiency; however, many healthcare providers lack formal education in virtual care delivery, including skills in virtual communication, physical examination adaptations, confidentiality, and billing procedures. This training gap can result in reduced confidence and suboptimal patient care. To address this, an asynchronous continuing professional development (CPD) module was developed. The objective of this study was to evaluate the module's efficacy regarding satisfaction and changes in knowledge and confidence. Methods: The module covered key topics such as virtual visit etiquette, technology troubleshooting, adapted physical examinations, documentation, and remuneration processes. Interactive features included embedded videos, knowledge-check quizzes, and reflective questions. A single-group pre-post quasi-experimental design was used to evaluate its impact. Data were collected Results: A total of nine to 22 learners responded at each time point. Respondents were heterogeneous, with most identifying as male (66.7%), general practitioners (55.6%), practicing in hospital settings (55.6%), and in communities of 2,000 to 10,000 people (55.6%). Learners reported high satisfaction with the module's content relevance, navigation, and interactive components, but requested more interactive components ( Conclusion: This evaluation study demonstrated that the asynchronous virtual care module had a statistically significant impact on objective knowledge and confidence, in addition to having positive satisfaction ratings. Limitations include the small sample size and lack of long-term follow-up to assess sustained practice change. However, these findings support the incorporation of asynchronous, virtual modules into CPD curricula to enhance provider competencies in virtual care delivery. Future directions include integrating additional case-based and specialty-specific content, as well as exploring the module's scalability for other health professions to promote interprofessional virtual care training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.