ArticlePeerJ2025
Hybrid contour and geometric partitioning for accurate plantar foot region segmentation.
Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Precise segmentation of plantar foot regions is crucial for analyzing foot structure and pressure distribution, aiding in the diagnosis of pathologies and enabling preventive interventions. However, conventional segmentation approaches often struggle to accurately delineate key anatomical regions and detect their boundaries, particularly in the presence of foot abnormalities. Methods: We created a dataset of plantar pressure images and proposed a hybrid algorithm that integrates edge contour detection techniques with dynamic geometric partitioning to address persistent challenges in plantar region segmentation. Our method first determines the lengths of the left and right feet using precise contour detection, then partitions the plantar surface into primary anatomical regions (forefoot, midfoot, and heel) based on standardized geometric proportions. Additionally, the methodology allows for finer subdivisions ( Results: A comparative evaluation of three edge detection methods revealed that the Canny algorithm, when combined with geometric partitioning, yielded superior performance. On a dataset of 200 plantar pressure footprints encompassing both normal and abnormal feet, this hybrid approach achieved Intersection over Union (IoU) and mean Average Precision (mAP) scores exceeding 0.90 across all segmented regions (forefoot, midfoot, and heel). Furthermore, the results indicate that the proposed hybrid algorithm performs comparably across both normal and abnormal foot types, with no significant differences observed. Conclusions: Our synergistic integration of contour detection and geometric partitioning yields an efficient technique for segmenting plantar regions from static plantar pressure images. Validation on a diverse dataset shows that the proposed approach accurately distinguishes foot-specific regions across five different foot types, including both normal and pathological cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.