Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41287796›Full record

ReviewWellcome open research2025

Mapping key issues and useful theory to address remaining ethical, practical and political challenges in participatory research in health.

Robin Vincent, Janet Harris, Rene Loewenson, Helene-Mari Van der Westhuizen, Gill Black, Geoff Wong, Sassy Molyneux

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Wellcome open research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Robin VincentCentre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Deparment of ClinicalMedicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LG, UK, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5124-2593
Janet HarrisDivision of Population Health, School of Health and Related Research ScHARR, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK.
Rene LoewensonTARSC, Harare, Zimbabwe.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9928-540X
Helene-Mari Van der WesthuizenCentre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Deparment of ClinicalMedicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LG, UK, UK.
Gill BlackSustainable Livelihoods Foundation, Cape Town, South Africa.
Geoff WongNuffield Department of Primary Health Care Services, University of Oxford, Oxfrod, OX2 6GG, UK.
Sassy MolyneuxCentre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Deparment of ClinicalMedicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LG, UK, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Participation is recognised as having a key role in health, for increasing the relevance and effectiveness of health interventions, for the health promoting benefits of community empowerment and as an ethical imperative. Participatory approaches to health research are also increasingly valued for bringing the insights of lived experience, and more relevant research and action. In this paper, we explore key remaining issues in participatory action research highlighted by scholars, practitioners and published literature, and highlight some useful conceptual resources which help to better understand them. We distinguish participatory action research as a paradigm involving those most affected throughout the research process, contrasting it with the more limited use of participatory tools and methods. We outline several aspects of participatory action research in health that would benefit from further theoretical and practical development, including: shifting power in the research process; the compatibility of participatory research with biomedical research; linking local inquiry and action to broader changes in policy and practice; and working with experiential knowledge in a rigorous research process. We highlight useful theory from a range of disciplines (including beyond the participatory research literature) that helps to understand some of the key processes and dynamics implicated in the issues highlighted and how this affects the outcomes achieved. We outline and share these conceptual/theoretical resources, identified as part of preparation for conducting a realist review on participatory action research in health, to contribute to ongoing reflection and development in the field.

Indexed as

co-productionknowledge generationlived experienceParticipationparticipatory action researchparticipatory researchpowerrealist review

Identifiers

PMID41287796
PMCPMC12640488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.