ArticleCureus2025
Early Osseointegration and Lower Loosening Rates With Trabecular Metal Revision Cups in Acetabular Bone Loss: A Comparative Cohort Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Radiographic features of bone ingrowth in highly porous cementless total knee arthroplasty with minimum 2-year follow-up.Arthroplasty (London, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRevision total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the presence of significant acetabular bone loss remains challenging, particularly in Paprosky IIC-III defects, where biomechanical stability and biological fixation are often compromised. Trabecular metal (TM) revision cups were developed to enhance osseointegration through high porosity and an elastic modulus closer to native bone, yet comparative real-world evidence against conventional revision cups remains limited in early follow-up.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective comparative cohort analysis of patients undergoing acetabular revision THA for Paprosky IIC-III defects between 2022 and 2024. Ten patients were included, with six receiving TM cups (TM group) and four receiving conventional revision cups (control group). Radiographic osseointegration was assessed through secondary signs of ingrowth (absence of radiolucent lines, bone apposition, and absence of migration), while clinical fixation and early stability were evaluated using postoperative Harris Hip Score (HHS) and complication rates. Minimum follow-up was 12 months.
resultsEarly radiographic osseointegration was observed in 100% of the TM group versus 50% of the conventional group at 12 months. No cup migration or radiographic loosening occurred in the TM group, while two cases in the control group demonstrated early signs of mechanical instability. Mean postoperative HHS improved more robustly in the TM group (from 41.8 to 78.6) compared to controls (from 40.9 to 68.3). There were no infections or dislocations in either cohort. One patient who received a conventional cup required prolonged protected weight bearing due to suspected partial loss of early fixation.
conclusionIn revision THA for Paprosky IIC-III acetabular defects, TM cups demonstrated markedly higher rates of early osseointegration and lower radiographic loosening at 12 months compared with conventional revision cups. These findings support the preferential use of TM technology in cases of advanced acetabular bone loss, where biological fixation is critical for long-term stability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.