ReviewCureus2025
The Role of Augmented Reality in Surgical Training: A Narrative Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Augmented reality (AR) is increasingly being integrated into open and laparoscopic surgical education, layering digital guidance onto real-world instruments and tissues to promote safer, more structured skill acquisition. This narrative review synthesizes recent evidence on AR platforms, including video-based overlays, head-mounted displays, and hybrid box-trainer systems, used for basic and advanced tasks, telementoring, and procedural rehearsal. Across surgical specialties, AR-enhanced training consistently improves objective performance metrics, such as task completion times, error rates, and standardized assessment scores (e.g., GOALS/OSATS), compared with conventional methods. It also lowers cognitive workload while enabling standardized feedback and remote expert support. Early integration into robotic surgery training suggests similar benefits in reducing learning curves and enhancing spatial awareness. However, significant barriers persist, including the technical challenge of accurately registering virtual overlays with real anatomy, ergonomic issues and visual fatigue associated with head-mounted displays, and a lack of hardware and software standardization. Furthermore, the evidence base is dominated by small, single-center studies, which limit the generalizability of findings and confirmation of long-term skill transfer to the operating room. Future priorities should focus on developing higher-fidelity haptics, achieving seamless curricular integration, and conducting multicenter randomized trials that track skill retention and patient-centered outcomes. Ultimately, AR serves as a powerful adjunct rather than a replacement for traditional simulation and mentorship, holding substantial potential to broaden access to high-quality surgical training and enhance operator performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.