Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41287731›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Characteristic Optical Coherence Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings in a Case of Seronegative Neuroretinitis.

Camden E Treat, Noah Vermette, Shamseldeen Mahmoud

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Camden E TreatRadiology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, USA.
Noah VermetteRadiology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, USA.
Shamseldeen MahmoudRadiology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroretinitis is a rare ophthalmologic disorder that presents with painless loss of vision. In this report, we describe the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in a case of seronegative, idiopathic neuroretinitis, which occurred in the setting of a recent tick bite. A 42-year-old man with no past medical history of eye complaints presented to Saint Louis University Emergency Department with painless loss of visual acuity in his left eye worsening over the span of one week. The patient denied additional ocular symptoms and any symptoms of recent infection such as headache, fever, cough, sore throat, chest pain, joint pain, nausea, and vomiting. Relevant recent history was limited to a report of a tick bite while traveling in Illinois that was followed by a self-resolving "red ring" rash. However, infectious workup, including tests for Lyme disease antibody, was negative. An MRI of the brain and orbits with and without contrast was performed, demonstrating increased thickening and enhancement in the left optic disc. Ocular coherence tomography (OCT) demonstrated optic nerve edema with intraretinal fluid with scattered exudates extending to fovea, along with distortion of contour of subretinal fluid. These imaging findings, in conjunction with patient history and fundoscopic examination, supported a diagnosis of neuroretinitis with no identified etiology.

Indexed as

magnetic resonance imagingneuroradiologyneuroretinitisophthalmologyoptical coherence tomographyvision loss

Identifiers

PMID41287731
PMCPMC12640376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.