ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2025
Quick Analysis of Sedimentary Ancient DNA Using quicksand.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Investigating ancient human DNA preservation on cave walls and in rock art.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ancient DNA extracted from the sediments of archaeological sites (sedaDNA) can provide fine-grained information about the composition of past ecosystems and human site use, even in the absence of visible remains. However, the growing amount of available sequencing data and the nature of the data obtained from archaeological sediments pose several computational challenges; among these, the rapid and accurate taxonomic classification of sequences. While alignment-based taxonomic classifiers remain the standard in sedaDNA analysis pipelines, they are too computationally expensive for the processing of large numbers of sedaDNA sequences. In contrast, alignment-free methods offer fast classification but suffer from higher false-positive rates. To address these limits, we developed quicksand, an open-source Nextflow pipeline designed for rapid and accurate taxonomic classification of mammalian mitochondrial DNA in sedaDNA samples. quicksand combines fast alignment-free classification using KrakenUniq with post-classification mapping, filtering, and ancient DNA authentication. Based on simulations and reanalyses of published datasets, we demonstrate that quicksand achieves accuracy and sensitivity comparable to or better than existing methods, while significantly reducing runtime. quicksand offers an easy workflow for large-scale screening of sedaDNA samples for archaeological research and is freely available at https://github.com/mpieva/quicksand.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.