ArticleYonsei medical journal2025
Cost-Utility Analysis of Universal Lynch Syndrome Screening among Colorectal Cancer Patients in a Low-Middle-Income Country.
Article in Yonsei medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Genetic Landscape of Lynch Syndrome in a High-Risk Serbian Cohort: Predominance ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeLynch syndrome (LS) is the most common hereditary cause of colorectal cancer (CRC). While screening for LS is recommended in Western countries, limited economic evaluations exist in lower-middle-income countries such as Vietnam, where CRC incidence is rapidly increasing. This study assessed the cost-utility of universal LS screening in Vietnam from the healthcare system's perspective. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe developed a decision-analytic model integrating decision trees and Markov models to compare the cost-effectiveness of three strategies: no screening, universal immunohistochemistry (IHC) followed by germline testing, and germline testing without prior tumor analysis. Cost data were derived from Vietnamese healthcare sources, and outcomes were measured in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). To assess parameter uncertainty, we conducted both one-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis.
resultsUniversal LS screening was found to be highly cost-effective. Universal germline testing identified the most LS CRC patients (n=742), followed by universal IHC testing (n=646). Compared to no screening, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were 47615038 VND/QALY (1904 USD/QALY) for germline testing and 126095537 VND/QALY (5043 USD/QALY) for IHC. Key influential variables included LS prevalence, CRC risk in LS carriers, the proportion of relatives with LS accepting increased surveillance, the acceptance rate of LS testing among relatives, and germline testing cost.
conclusionAll LS screening strategies for CRC patients are cost-effective within the Vietnamese health system, with germline testing being the most favorable. These findings support the inclusion of LS screening in health policies, even in resource-limited settings such as Vietnam.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.