Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41287434›Full record

ArticleClinics in shoulder and elbow2025

Up-to-date concepts and procedures in shoulder instability: a comprehensive review.

Ki-Tae Kim, Kyu-Cheol Noh, Yong-Tae Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinics in shoulder and elbow, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ki-Tae KimDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Kyu-Cheol NohDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Korea.
Yong-Tae KimDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hwaseong, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shoulder instability, particularly anterior instability, remains a significant clinical and socioeconomic burden, especially in young, active populations. Recent advancements have refined our understanding of critical and subcritical bone loss, bipolar lesions, and dynamic stabilization concepts. This review synthesizes current evidence by analyzing recent clinical studies, biomechanical research, and technological developments related to the management of anterior shoulder instability. While traditional soft-tissue procedures such as the Bankart repair maintain a role in select low-risk patients, emerging data support earlier consideration of bony augmentation or dynamic stabilization in high-risk cohorts. Moreover, technologies such as dynamic anterior stabilization, arthroscopic Latarjet procedures, suture-button fixation, and biologic augmentation strategies are redefining treatment algorithms. Recent advances have reshaped the approach to shoulder instability, emphasizing individualized strategies based on bone loss, patient risk profile, and dynamic stabilizing techniques. An evidence-based framework is essential for optimizing clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

ArthroscopeBankart lesionsJoint instabilityShoulder dislocationShoulder joint

Identifiers

PMID41287434
PMCPMC12415467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.