ArticlemAbs2025
Balancing brain exposure, pharmacokinetics and safety of transferrin receptor antibodies for delivery of neuro-therapeutics.
Article in mAbs, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Engineering Advanced Nanomedicine Against Depression: From Treatment Challenges to Delivery Strategies.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Antibody-oligonucleotide conjugates: design principles, intracellular delivery, and translational opportunities.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2026Review
- Progress of Immunotherapies in Parkinson's Disease.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Review
- Research progress and development strategies of antibody-oligonucleotide conjugates.Gene therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Progress in developing effective large-molecule therapies for neurological diseases is limited by exposure at the sites of action, beyond the blood-brain barrier (BBB). While transferrin receptor (TfR1)-mediated transport is gaining validation as a mechanism to deliver medicines of multiple modalities to the brain, there is much still to be learned about maximizing the potential of TfR1 targeting. We systematically vary for the first time affinity and valency of two anti‑TfR1 antibodies, which have distinct epitopes and pH sensitivities, to investigate their effects on cellular trafficking, biodistribution, safety, and pharmacokinetics. We establish how transcytosis and receptor degradation trend with affinity and connect these in-vitro functions to in-vivo behaviors in brain uptake and reticulocyte depletion. We identify unique anti-TfR1 antibody profiles for either short-term maximal or long-term sustained brain delivery and demonstrate the utility of these shuttles for different pharmacological applications. Our results show that bivalent anti-TfR1 antibodies can be equally effective in brain uptake as monovalent antibodies if engineered to have similar cell-surface TfR1 binding strength, with prolonged brain exposure and less severe adverse effects, but epitope, as well as affinity and valency, factors into selecting a shuttle with maximal performance. These results challenge the view that monovalent formats are inherently superior and instead establish that affinity, valency, and epitope can be tuned to select TfR1 shuttles optimized for different therapeutic needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.