ArticleJournal of dental education2026
Effect of Practical Demonstration on Reducing Technical Radiographic Errors Made by Dental Students.
Article in Journal of dental education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe aim of this study was to examine the frequency, types, and distribution of technical errors in periapical radiographic images taken by dental students, as well as to evaluate the effect of practical demonstration on these parameters.
methodsThe study involved a comprehensive evaluation of 960 periapical radiographic images taken by 80 junior year dental students, both prior to and following a demonstration conducted using a radiographic phantom. All images were obtained using the bisecting angle technique with photostimulable phosphor (PSP) plates, without the use of a film holder, and were assessed by four observers.
resultsOne or more technical errors were identified in 783 of the 960 images (81.6%). The most common error was related to sensor positioning, both before and after the demonstration (57.3% and 55.6%, respectively). The highest proportion of errors was identified in the maxillary anterior region (26.8%), followed by the mandibular anterior region (21.6%). Errors were slightly more prevalent in the maxilla (53.6%) than in the mandible (46.4%). The frequency of technical errors before and after the demonstration was similar, with statistically significant differences noted only for crown cutoff, non-parallel positioning to the occlusal plane, and shortening errors. A decrease in the total number of errors was observed in approximately two-thirds of the students (61.25%).
conclusionThese findings highlight the need to strengthen undergraduate dental education in radiographic techniques and radiation protection. Integrating structured instruction on radiographic errors and their correction earlier in the curriculum may enhance student competence. In addition to practical demonstrations, the incorporation of simulation-based training, supervised clinical practice, and structured feedback could further improve radiographic skills and reduce technical errors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.