ArticleBJPsych open2025
Predictors of suicidal ideation in UK doctors: retrospective case-control study from NHS Practitioner Health.
Article in BJPsych open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDepression severity is a well-established risk factor for suicidal ideation, but the extent to which sociodemographic and employment-related factors contribute independently remains unclear.
aimsComplete data from doctors (
methodUsing PHQ-8 score (PHQ-9, excluding the item on suicide ideation) as a proxy for depression severity, the case-control discriminatory capacity of receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were evaluated for (a) a univariable model studying modified PHQ-9 alone as the predictor of severe suicide ideation; and (b) a multivariable model integrating modified PHQ-9 and multiple sociodemographic and employment factors as the predictor of severe suicide ideation. Models were compared both descriptively and through a likelihood ratio test.
resultsThe univariable model using depression severity alone as the predictor of severe suicide ideation yielded an AUC of 0.921. The addition of sociodemographic and employment factors improved the fit significantly (likelihood ratio test with (
conclusionsIn this national cohort of doctors, depression severity was strongly associated with suicidal ideation. However, disability and lack of a partner were also independently linked to increased risk, suggesting that suicidal ideation is not solely driven by symptom severity. Social and functional factors may help identify higher-risk individuals and inform targeted support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.