ArticleClinical psychology & psychotherapy
The Die Is Cast: Decision-Making Under Risk and Under Ambiguity in Schizophrenia and Alcohol Use Disorder.
Article in Clinical psychology & psychotherapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Die Is Cast: Decision-Making Under Risk and Under Ambiguity in Schizophrenia and Alcohol Use Disorder.Clinical psychology & psychotherapyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Patients with schizophrenia (SZ) tend towards riskier decision-making (DM). Yet the specificity of these findings, as well as the impact of impairments in executive functions (EF), has not been sufficiently clarified. In a preregistered study (https://osf.io/n7z6y) 40 SZ, 50 patients with alcohol use disorder (AUD) and 36 healthy controls (HC) completed an n-back task (as EF challenge), the Game of Dice Task (GDT; DM under risk) and the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT; DM under ambiguity). AUD and SZ performed worse than HC in the n-back task and riskier in the GDT. In the IGT, only AUD performed riskier than HC and preferred disadvantageous Deck B compared to SZ. However, controlling for demographics and IQ abolished significance. Correlations of performance in the GDT and IGT with working memory differed between groups. Taken together, both patient groups show a deficit in the reflective system, whereas only AUD show impairments in the impulsive system. Thus, the direct comparison of DM in SZ and AUD reveals a differential DM profile of SZ and AUD. Our results suggest that both groups may benefit from EF training, especially in planning, categorization and cognitive flexibility, whereas AUD could additionally profit from impulse control and inhibition training. However, the findings need replication with well-matched samples, and the link between EF and DM in SZ should be examined more carefully with experimental approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.