Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41287123›Full record

ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2025

Can abbreviated MRI replace standard protocols in IPMN surveillance? A retrospective comparative study.

Sevde Nur Emir, Görkem Karamustafao, Gülbanu Güner, Servet Emir, Yahya Özel, Fatma Kulalı

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sevde Nur EmirDepartment of Radiology, University of Health Sciences, Umraniye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey. drsevdenuremir@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5749-8776
Görkem KaramustafaoDepartment of Radiology, University of Health Sciences, Umraniye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3721-5326
Gülbanu GünerDepartment of Radiology, University of Health Sciences, Umraniye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7825-587X
Servet EmirDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Umraniye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0342-6536
Yahya ÖzelGeneral Surgery Department, Dogus University VM Medical Park Pendik Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3602-4923
Fatma KulalıDepartment of Radiology, University of Health Sciences, Umraniye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9392-6907

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the advancements in imaging technologies and the widespread use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the detection rates of pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) have significantly increased. While most of these lesions are benign, branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (BD-IPMNs) pose a potential risk for malignant transformation, necessitating regular clinical and radiological follow-up. However, conventional MRI protocols are time-consuming and resource-intensive, prompting the need for shorter, cost-effective alternatives without compromising diagnostic accuracy. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance and clinical feasibility of abbreviated MRI (A-MRI) protocols for BD-IPMN surveillance compared to standard MRI (S-MRI).

methodsThis was a single-center, retrospective study including patients with BD-IPMN who underwent follow-up MRI between January 2022 and December 2024. Three MRI protocols were analyzed: (1) S-MRI, comprising T2-weighted imaging, dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) T1-weighted imaging, 3D MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI); (2) A-MRI protocol 1 (A-MRI-1), including MRCP and T2-weighted sequences; and (3) A-MRI protocol 2 (A-MRI-2), incorporating MRCP, T2-weighted, and DWI sequences. The images were evaluated for lesion size progression (≥ 5 mm in 2 years), mural nodules, cyst wall thickening, main pancreatic duct dilation, and parenchymal atrophy. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for A-MRI protocols in detecting degeneration signs.

resultsA total of 124 patients (mean age: 64 years, 55.6% female) and 124 lesions were analyzed. The detection rates of key degeneration markers were similar between S-MRI and A-MRI protocols, except for contrast-enhanced mural nodules, which were not identifiable with A-MRI due to the lack of DCE sequences. The overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for A-MRI in detecting BD-IPMN degeneration markers were 100%, 98.3%, 71.4%, and 100%, respectively. A-MRI protocols demonstrated a comparable diagnostic performance to S-MRI while significantly reducing scan time (from ~ 40-50 min to 7-12 min). However, false-positive mural nodule detection was higher with A-MRI, potentially leading to unnecessary follow-up imaging. The addition of DWI in A-MRI-2 did not provide a significant diagnostic advantage over A-MRI-1.

conclusionsA-MRI is a viable alternative for BD-IPMN follow-up, offering substantial reductions in imaging duration and costs while maintaining high diagnostic accuracy. However, the absence of DCE sequences may lead to false-positive mural nodule detection, necessitating further evaluation in selected cases.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingPancreatic Intraductal NeoplasmsPancreatic NeoplasmsAdultAgedCholangiopancreatography, Magnetic ResonanceContrast MediaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityContrast Media

Identifiers

PMID41287123
PMCPMC12642295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.