ArticleBMC psychology2025
The impact of AI integration in project preparation in education course on pre-service teachers' innovativeness, AI anxiety, attitudes, and acceptance.
Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Impact of Unscaffolded GenAI Use on Pre-Service Teachers' AI Readiness, Self-Regulated Learning, Critical Thinking, and Instructional Design Performance: A Quasi-Experimental Study.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Mathematics teachers' AI literacy, anxiety, and perceptions of AI integration in mathematics education: a mixed-methods study.BMC psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in education has transformed teacher education programs. This study examined the effects of incorporating AI tools into a Project Preparation in Education course for pre-service teachers, focusing on individual innovativeness, AI anxiety, AI attitudes, and AI acceptance. Using a single-group pre-test and post-test design, validated scales were administered to 34 pre-service teachers before and after the intervention. Paired-samples t-tests with Holm–Bonferroni corrections revealed significant improvements in AI attitudes (gₐv = 0.64) and AI acceptance (gₐv = 0.70). Individual innovativeness increased slightly, primarily in opinion leadership subdimension (gₐv = 0.35), whereas AI anxiety showed no significant change (gₐv ≈ 0.05). These medium-to-large gains. underscore the potential of guided and AI-supported instruction to enhance teachers’ readiness for AI integration across the stages of the academic writing process. However, the absence of a control group limits causal inference, and the results should be interpreted as correlational evidence of change. Overall, the study highlights both the promise and boundaries of short-term AI interventions in teacher education, offering implications for curriculum design and professional development in AI-driven learning environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.