SynthesisThe international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS2025
Application of the Da Vinci Single-Port (SP) Robot in General Surgery: A First Systematic Review.
Synthesis in The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Application of the Da Vinci Single-Port (SP) Robot in General Surgery: A First Systematic Review.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2025Pooled it
- Adoption of single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy following multiport xi experience: lessons from a learning curve analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Single-port EDGE SP1000 versus multi-port Da Vinci Xi robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a comparative analysis of technique and perioperative outcomes.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- da Vinci robotic-assisted surgery: implications for modern anesthetic practice.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- A commentary on "Feasibility of robotic liver resection compared with laparoscopic and open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a network meta-analysis".International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
- Current status of single-port robotic surgery in hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: technical aspects of review.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2026Review
- Current issue on special topic: robotic single-port system in general surgery.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMinimally invasive surgery has revolutionized surgical practice by reducing surgical trauma and enhancing recovery. In this context, the da Vinci SP System represents a major technological advancement. This review aims to report its clinical applications in general surgery, evaluating associated outcomes and potential advantages.
methodsA systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase and Web-of-Science databases was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. The study was pre-registered in PROSPERO.
resultsSeventy-six studies involving 1841 patients were included. The most frequently reported procedures were colorectal/transanal surgeries (868) and cholecystectomies (661). Learning-curve analyses for SP colorectal surgery demonstrated performance stabilization after 18-21 cases. Comparative studies showed shorter docking times and reduced hospital stays for SP procedures compared to laparoscopic multiport or single-site robotic approaches.
conclusionThe da Vinci SP system appears to be a safe and feasible option for various general surgery procedures. Preliminary evidence supports improved perioperative efficiency in specific contexts, though further validation is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.