ArticleInjury epidemiology2025
Firearm experiences and safe storage challenges among a sample of Black adults: a rapid qualitative analysis.
Article in Injury epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comfort With Talking to Healthcare and Community Professionals About Firearm Safety: Insights for Suicide Prevention From a Sample of Black Adults.Journal of primary care & community healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFirearms are a leading cause of death among Black adults in the U.S., accounting for more than 300,000 years of potential life lost in each of the past five years. Firearms are particularly challenging for suicide prevention in Black American communities. Few recent studies have been dedicated to investigating firearm ownership and safety challenges among Black adults. Without this understanding, promising interventions such as safe storage programs and lethal means counseling may inadequately address the specific challenges and motivations relevant to Black firearm owners. Our objective was to gather feedback from Black adults with access to firearms in their homes on their (1) experience with firearms (2), rationale for firearms being in their homes, and (3) perceived challenges or barriers to safely storing firearms in their homes.
methodsThis study involved semi-structured interviews and rapid qualitative analysis. 15 Black adults ages 18 years and older in the U.S. who had access to firearms in their homes participated. We developed a Transcript Summary Template to deductively condense all relevant information for three topics. Matrix analysis techniques were used to identify emerging key concepts in the responses to each topic.
resultsThe participants' relationships with firearms appeared to be shaped by family traditions, vulnerability, and safety concerns that sometimes extended across generations. Participants described various pathways to firearm access, from childhood introductions through parents who viewed firearms as necessary protection against racial threats, to adult acquisition motivated by experiences of violence, discrimination, or a hobby. Key challenges to household firearm storage safety emerged: limited access to firearm safety knowledge and training in Black communities, the financial and time costs associated with safe firearm storage, and concerns about children gaining access to firearms and the importance of communicating with children about firearms in the home.
conclusionsThis study provides new insights into factors shaping firearm ownership and perceived challenges to safe firearm storage among a sample of Black adults in the U.S. Our findings may help inform community-driven and clinician-focused initiatives that acknowledge the context of Black firearm ownership while promoting evidence-based safety practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.