ArticleJournal of medical case reports2025
Successful multidisciplinary treatment of cardiac tamponade from type A aortic dissection rupture in a pregnant woman with pre-eclampsia: a case report.
Article in Journal of medical case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAortic dissection is a rare but potentially fatal condition. In pregnant women, although aortic dissection incidence is low, it presents with sudden onset, rapid progression, frequent diagnostic errors, substantial surgical risks, and high mortality for both mother and fetus. A 38-year-old Chinese woman, gravida 5 para 2, with chronic hypertension and pre-eclampsia, experienced sudden back pain and dyspnea at 37 weeks of gestation. Within 90 min, she was diagnosed with aortic dissection and cardiac tamponade. A multidisciplinary team conducted a cesarean section, ligated the ascending branches of the bilateral uterine arteries, and performed intrauterine balloon tamponade. Concurrently, they executed coronary artery repair, along with the ascending aorta and partial aortic arch replacement. Both maternal and fetal outcomes were favorable, and the patient's fertility was preserved.
conclusionType A aortic dissection during pregnancy is a critical condition. Early diagnosis and tailored plans through multidisciplinary cooperation can achieve good maternal and neonatal outcomes. Uterine artery ligation and Bakri balloon compression during cesarean sections effectively preserve fertility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.