Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41287094›Full record

ArticleJournal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine2025

Traditional utilization of weeds and ethnic ecological wisdom in Longsheng terraces-a study based on globally important agricultural heritage systems.

Wanli Ma, Yu Zeng, Jiurun Zhou, Renchuan Hu, Haiou Liu, Yujing Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wanli MaCollege of Life Sciences, Nanjing Agriculture University, Nanjing, 210095, China.
Yu ZengCollege of Life Sciences, Nanjing Agriculture University, Nanjing, 210095, China.
Jiurun ZhouCollege of Life Sciences, Nanjing Agriculture University, Nanjing, 210095, China.
Renchuan HuGuangxi Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Quality Standards, Guangxi Institute of Traditional Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nanning, 530022, China.
Haiou LiuChinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing, 100012, China. liu_haiou@sina.com.
Yujing LiuCollege of Life Sciences, Nanjing Agriculture University, Nanjing, 210095, China. liuyujing@njau.edu.cn.

Funding

Agricultural Research Funding from the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of China HYJG22103Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities KYXJ202006GEF-Building Sustainability into PA Reforms to Conserve Globally Significant Biodiversity in China 9461the National Natural Science Foundation of China 31600254
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWeeds, which have long seen as nutrient competitors for crops, have made chemical weeding mainstream in agriculture. However, in Guangxi's Longsheng Terraces, a global agricultural heritage site, the Zhuang, Yao and Dong peoples value them as medicine, food, feed and even tools. This undocumented traditional knowledge, under chemical agriculture and tourism pressures, is on the verge of extinction.

methodsThis study integrates research methods from ethnobotany and weed science and conducts a survey on weed species across 11 types of farmlands, including paddy fields and corn fields in the Longsheng Terraces. It focuses on traditional knowledge of weed utilization among the Zhuang, Yao, and Dong ethnic groups. A total of 36 key informants were recruited using snowball sampling supplemented by referrals from local government agencies. Through semi-structured interviews, data on the local names, uses, utilized parts, and frequency of use of these weeds were recorded. Additionally, indicators such as frequency of citation (FC), informant consensus factor (FIC) and use value (UV) were employed to analyze their value quantitatively.

resultsA total of 49 weed species feature traditional utilization value, covering four major categories: medicinal use (41 species, accounting for 81.6%), edible, forage, and tool material use. Among them, Polygonum hydropiper, Plantago asiatica, Lygodium microphyllum, Actinidia chinensis, and Boehmeria nivea had the highest use value. In terms of usage consensus, there was a high level of consensus within the community regarding weed utilization knowledge for conditions such as coryza and snake bites. Notably, 29 medicinal weeds have not been recorded in the Pharmacopoeia of the People's Republic of China. Among the 14 medicinal weeds that are included in the Pharmacopoeia, the uses of nine species remain unrecorded, which indicates that these weeds have potential development value. Analysis of ethnic differences revealed that the Yao ethnic group utilized the most abundant weed species, followed by the Zhuang and the Dong. The similarity coefficient analysis revealed that the Zhuang and Yao ethnic groups presented the highest similarity in weed utilization knowledge, whereas the similarity between the Zhuang and Dong ethnic groups was the lowest. The inheritance of traditional knowledge showed a significant intergenerational decreasing trend, with no gender difference observed. Additionally, the impact of tourism development on the weed utilization rate did not reach statistical significance.

conclusionsThis study reveals the multidimensional value of weeds in the Longsheng Terraces and the traditional ecological wisdom they embody, providing significant reference values for biodiversity conservation, traditional knowledge inheritance, and sustainable agricultural development at global agricultural cultural heritage sites. Moreover, systematic research and protective measures are needed to prevent the loss of these valuable resources due to improper management.

Indexed as

AgriculturePlant WeedsAdultChinaEthnicityEthnobotanyFemaleHumansKnowledgeMaleMiddle AgedAgrobiodiversity conservationEthnic differencesEthnobotanyGlobally important agricultural heritage system (GIAHS)Weed traditional utilization

Identifiers

PMID41287094
PMCPMC12642339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.