ArticleJournal of translational medicine2025
TRANSPIRE-DRP: a deep learning framework for translating patient-derived xenograft drug response to clinical patients via domain adaptation.
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cancer metastasis: biological mechanisms, therapeutic bottlenecks, and emerging interventions.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2026Review
- TMEDRP: decoding tumor-intrinsic and microenvironmental signatures for clinical drug response prediction.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Harnessing PDX and PDX 2.0: the next-generation paradigm for precision oncology and translational breakthroughs.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- The impact of deep learning and omics data in transforming precision therapy for brain cancer.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Aided Microfluidic Cell Culture Systems.Biosensors · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPredicting individual patient responses to anticancer drugs is a central challenge in precision oncology, hindered by the scarcity of clinical pharmacogenomic data and substantial biological dissimilarity between preclinical models and patient tumors. Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models offer significantly enhanced tumor biological fidelity compared to in vitro cancer cell line models, yet computational methods to translate PDX-based drug response predictions (DRP) into clinical settings remain limited.
methodsWe developed TRANSPIRE-DRP, a deep learning framework that bridges the translational gap between PDX models and patient tumors through unsupervised domain adaptation. The framework employs a two-stage architecture: first, an autoencoder-based pretraining phase learns domain-invariant genomic representations from large-scale unlabeled data; second, an adversarial adaptation phase aligns these representations while preserving drug response signals from PDX models. We evaluated TRANSPIRE-DRP across three therapeutic agents—Cetuximab, Paclitaxel, and Gemcitabine—in real-life clinical prediction scenarios.
resultsTRANSPIRE-DRP consistently outperformed both cell line-based state-of-the-art models and PDX-based baselines, demonstrating superior translational capacity. Notably, the learned representations preserved tumor-specific molecular features and spontaneously recapitulated established drug-cancer type associations without requiring explicit histological annotations. Interpretability analyses revealed biologically coherent pathway enrichments consistent with known drug mechanisms of action, including EGFR-Wnt signaling crosstalk for Cetuximab, mitotic arrest mechanism for Paclitaxel, and NF-κB-mediated immunomodulation for Gemcitabine.
conclusionsTRANSPIRE-DRP establishes a scalable, interpretable, and clinically relevant framework for translating preclinical PDX data into personalized therapeutic predictions, providing a robust computational foundation for advancing precision oncology beyond the inherent limitations of traditional in vitro systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.