ArticleBMC psychology2025
Interdisciplinary value-based cognitive behavioral treatment for people with persistent pain after posttraumatic spinal cord injury (project VALIANT): protocol for an intervention study using multiple baselines single-case experimental design.
Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06599632 (Interdisciplinary Value-based Cognitive Behavioral Treatment for People With Spinal Cord Injury After Road Traffic Accidents), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Interdisciplinary Value-based Cognitive Behavioral Treatment for People With Spinal Cord Injury After Road Traffic Accidents: Protocol for a Multiple Baselines Single-case Experimental Design.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSpinal cord injury (SCI) often leads to persistent pain and significant challenges in personal, social, and occupational life, requiring interdisciplinary rehabilitation. Despite advances in pain understanding, effective treatment for the impact of pain on daily living remains sparse. This study addresses the need for effective interventions with the aim of developing and testing an interdisciplinary values-based cognitive behavioral therapy (V-CBT) program for individuals with SCI and persistent pain, also with an objective to apply fine-grained data collection to explore effects and change processes.
methodsThis study is a replicated multiple baselines single-case experimental design (SCED). Nine participants with SCI and persistent pain will be block-randomized to 1, 2, or 3-week baseline phases, thus serving as their own controls. The intervention comprises a manualized V-CBT program with 10 sessions, delivered online or face-to-face based on participant preference, by an interdisciplinary team (psychologist and physiotherapist). The main aim of the intervention is to promote value-based behaviors. Data collection includes daily online self-reports as well as measurements at pre-treatment, post-treatment, and three-month follow-up. Structured visual analysis and statistical methods assess treatment effects, emphasizing within-case changes and individual responses. DISCUSSION: This study possesses several strengths and limitations. A key strength is the interdisciplinary team, consisting of experienced physiotherapists and a psychologist, ensuring a high standard of care. The SCED methodology enables detailed tracking of individual treatment responses, allowing for a nuanced analysis of efficacy and change processes. The integration of a pre-post design with a three-month follow-up enhances the study's robustness, while the relatively large sample size for a SCED study strengthens its reliability. Additionally, the optional online format improves accessibility for individuals with mobility challenges or those in remote areas, potentially increasing participation and adherence. However, limitations include the absence of professionals such as occupational therapists or physicians, which could provide a more holistic rehabilitation approach. The online format, while increasing reach, may introduce technical barriers and limit therapeutic engagement. SCED designs also require frequent data collection, which may lead to participant fatigue and dropout, impacting data completeness. Despite these challenges, the study offers valuable insights into SCI pain management.
trial registrationNCT06599632 (Clinicaltrials.gov; registered 13 September 2024).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.