ReviewInternational journal of mental health nursing2025
Carers' Perceptions of Seclusion and Restraints in Mental Healthcare: An Integrative Literature Review.
Review in International journal of mental health nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Experiences of restrictive practices in child and adolescent mental health inpatient care: an integrative review.Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health · 2026Review
- Carers' Perceptions of Seclusion and Restraints in Mental Healthcare: An Integrative Literature Review.International journal of mental health nursing · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of seclusion and restraints in mental health care is a significant international concern. Although these practices are perceived to de-escalate volatile situations and provide physical protection for those involved, they raise critical issues such as the violation of human rights, physical and emotional harm. Despite the crucial role of carers in recovery, care and protection for persons with lived experience of mental health conditions, few studies have explored their perspectives on seclusion and restraints. This integrative literature review explored carers' perceptions of these practices. A systematic search of four electronic databases, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, was conducted without time limitations, resulting in 10 final studies. The synthesis of the literature revealed that carers and persons with lived experience of mental health conditions have negative experiences of seclusion and restraints. However, while carers desire the elimination of seclusion and restraints, some do support the limited use, such as a 'last resort'. Importantly, many carers want to be involved before, during and after these events. Current evidence suggests that empathy is a key in de-escalation that is planned with persons with lived experience and their carers. Healthcare providers should prioritise carers' needs for engagement, emotional support and access to related information for effective reduction and elimination of seclusion and restraints. Training on de-escalation should focus on empathy, therapeutic relationships and communication during crisis. Empirical research should explore the role of carers in developing de-escalation plans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.